Last week I explained what the term JPEG meant. This week I will explain what RAW is, and why you should use it to take photos.
RAW vs JPEG – Why I Shoot in RAW and Share in JPEG. I capture all my images in RAW to get the maximum amount of data, and to give me the maximum image processing capabilities. And I convert to JPEG for sharing to benefit from the file size reduction and universal readability of the JPEG format.
This post is not a technical post about the intricacies of RAW and JPEG files – it is an explanation of RAW and JPEG file formats for photographers.
I only ever shoot in RAW and share in JPEG - let me tell you why.
What does JPEG mean?
Check out my blog post last week cunningly titled JPEG Explained In Plain English to find out all about JPEG.
I like this extract about the Joint Photographic Experts Group, which is a collection of technical people who came up with this standard format. I have copied this directly from Wikipedia as I think this sums up the subject nicely.
“JPEG ( /ˈdʒeɪpɛɡ/ JAY-peg)  is a commonly used method of lossy compression for digital images, particularly for those images produced by digital photography. The degree of compression can be adjusted, allowing a selectable trade off between storage size and image quality. JPEG typically achieves 10:1 compression with little perceptible loss in image quality.”
Ok – now it is time to concentrate on RAW files in this post.
What is the RAW in photography terms?
I say in photography terms as raw has obvious meanings in other contexts, one of which I will come onto later in this post.
RAW is an image format where the camera sensor captures all the data in a scene without applying any processing to the image. When I say no processing it is actually more accurate to say minimal image processing, as there has to be some processing to convert what is being captured into useable data.
This is in contrast to image capture using the JPEG file format, where there is an amount of processing carried out in the creation of the JPEG file. This editing cannot be undone.
This is the fundamental difference between RAW and JPEG files.
A RAW file is generally a higher quality image capture than a JPEG image capture. No “lossy” processing has been applied.
Are RAW files the modern equivalent of film negatives?
Pretty much yes they are. They are the digital medium from which images can be created. So I guess they are.
Are there different types of RAW files?
Yes. There are lots of RAW formats, pretty much one per camera manufacturer. Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Fuji, Sony, Panasonic, Hasselblad and Phase One all have their own RAW formats.
Most RAW files are actually based on the Tiff file format, but that is levels of detail that I am not going to go into because, to be completely honest, I do not understand them. And do not need to understand them!
Let’s move on.
Why is there no standard for RAW files?
That is a very good question. Adobe had a go with the introduction of the Dng file format, which is meant to be a universally compatible RAW file format, but this has not really taken off I have never converted files into Dng.
Why two file formats?
Well the perception is that RAW is for higher end and professional photography, and JPEG is for everyone else. That is to be fair probably a reasonable distinction. People who do not know what RAW is are probably happy with JPEG. There will be a significant proportion of the broader photographic community that just want to take and share photos without all that is involved in editing RAW files.
And pro photographers/ advanced amateurs will be using RAW unless they have made the conscious decision to do something else.
I said this before, but it is worth repeating – a RAW photo is generally a higher quality image than a JPEG photo.
What can I do with a RAW file that I cannot do with a JPEG file?
The first thing is the white balance. I use auto white balance, as I am fundamentally lazy. I can change the white balance in Lightroom to any of the white balance presets that I can select using my Canon 6D. They are
I know that the purists will say that I should select the appropriate white balance for the conditions I am taking photos in, and they are right of course, but I do not see the need to complicate my image capture.
I shoot in RAW and can select the white balance after the event in Lightroom.
With a JPEG file your choices are
The same applies to pretty much everything else that I might do when processing an image. The RAW file is a blank canvas for me to work on. A JPEG file is not.
The fundamental difference between RAW and JPEG files is this.
JPEG files have an amount on processing “baked-in” to the file which cannot be undone. Stuff like
A RAW file has none of this – hence the name RAW!
A food analogy to help explain
I like the “baked-in” term for JPEG – this is a rare food analogy. A JPEG file is a baked cake – once a cake is baked it is baked.
A RAW file is the RAW ingredients, not mixed together or baked, from which any amount of variations can be thrown together to create something like, erm a different cake?
I don’t like cake by the way. Enough cake talk.
Do I need specialist software to access RAW files?
Yes you do. I use specialist photo editing software to work on my RAW files, principally Lightroom. I also use Lightroom and Photoshop.
And if you do not have Lightroom or Photoshop there is software provided by each camera manufacturer with which you can access the proprietary RAW files. I don’t know anyone who does this to be honest.
I installed the Canon software when I bought my first Canon DSLR, but never used it as I had Lightroom.
Lightroom and Photoshop can read RAW and JPEG files with equal ease.
Do I need specialist software to access JPEG files?
No. If you have a computer chances are you can read JPEG files. And this applies to phones, tablets etc.
OK so we know how to access the files – how do I take images using the RAW file format?
This is how I work with RAW files